agave, fructoseMany people interested in staying healthy have switched to agave as a safer "natural" sweetener. They want to avoid well documented dangerous sweeteners like HFCS (high fructose corn syrup) but are unaware that agave is actually WORSE than HFCS.

This expose will offend many hard core natural health advocates because they have been convinced of the agave hype by companies that are promoting it.

Some have even criticized me for having "ulterior" motives. But nothing could be further from the truth. Although I do offer natural health products of sale on this site, I sell no competing products to agave.

Rather I recommend flavored stevia products like English Toffee or French Vanilla. You can also use xylitol in small amounts or glucose which is sold as dextrose and can easily be purchased on Amazon for $1 per pound. I do not sell any of these products.

My only purpose for sharing this information is to help people understand the truth about health. In case you haven't noticed we have an epidemic of obesity in the US and it wasn't until recently that my eyes opened up to the primary cause - - fructose.

I had similar epiphanies about omega-3 fats and vitamin D since I started this site, but this is the most major health appreciation I have had since I learned about vitamin D over five years ago. This is serious business and it is my intention to make the public fully aware of it and let you make your own choices.

Yes it is all about freedom of choice. It is hard to have freedom if you aren't given the entire story, and up until now that has been the case with agave.

So Just What is Agave?

Blue agave is an exotic plant growing in the rich volcanic soil of Mexico under a hot tropical sun, boasting a stately flower stem that blooms only once in its lifetime. "Agave" literally means "noble." It's generally recognized as a superstar of the herbal remedy world, claiming to offer relief for indigestion, bowel irregularity, and skin wounds.

Ferment it, and you have Mexico's favorite adult beverage -- tequila.

Just the name "agave" conjures up images of romantic tropical excursions and mysterious shamanic medicine.

These are the mental images agave "nectar" sellers want you to hold. They use agave's royal pedigree to cover the truth that what they're selling you is a bottle of high-fructose syrup, so highly processed and refined that it bears NO resemblance to the plant of its namesake.

What is the "Real" Truth about Agave?

If you knew the truth about what's really in it, you'd be dumping it down the drain -- and that would certainly be bad for sales.

Agave "nectar" or agave "syrup" is nothing more than a laboratory-generated super-condensed fructose syrup, devoid of virtually all nutrient value, offering you metabolic misfortune.

Unfortunately, masterful marketing has resulted in the astronomical popularity of agave syrup among people who believe they are doing their health a favor by avoiding refined sugars like high fructose corn syrup, and dangerous artificial sweeteners.

And if you're diabetic, you've been especially targeted and told this is simply the best thing for you since locally grown organic lettuce, that it's "diabetic friendly," has a "low glycemic index" and doesn't spike your blood sugar.

While agave syrup does have a low-glycemic index, so does antifreeze -- that doesn't mean it's good for you. Agave syrup has the highest fructose content of any commercial sweetener -- ranging from 70 to 97 percent, depending on the brand, which is FAR HIGHER than high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), which averages 55 percent.

This makes agave actually WORSE than HFCS.

It is important to understand that fructose does not increase insulin levels, which is not necessarily good as what it does do is radically increase insulin resistance, which is FAR more dangerous. You see, it's okay for your insulin levels to rise, that is normal. You just don't want these insulin levels to remain elevated, which is what insulin resistance causes.

That is why fasting insulin is such a powerful test, as it is a very powerful reflection of your insulin resistance.

In addition to insulin resistance, your risk of liver damage increases, along with triglycerides and a whole host of other health problems, as discussed in this CBC News video about the newly discovered dangers of high fructose corn syrup. The study discussed in this news report is about HFCS, however, it's well worth remembering that agave contains MORE fructose than HFCS, and in all likelihood, it's the FRUCTOSE that is causing these severe liver problems.

How Agave is Grown and Produced Proves it is Unnatural

Agaves grow primarily in Mexico, but you can also find them in the southern and western United States, as well as in South America. Agaves are not cacti, but succulents of the yucca family, more closely related to amaryllis and other lilies. Edible parts of the agave are the flowers, leaves, stalks and the sap.

A mature agave is 7 to 12 feet in diameter with leaves that are 5 to 8 feet tall -- an impressive plant in stature, to be sure. There are over 100 species of agave, in a wide variety of sizes and colors.

Although the industry wants you to believe that agave nectar runs straight from the plant and into your jar, nothing could not be farther from the truth.

In spite of manufacturer's claims, agave "nectar" is not made from the sap of the yucca or agave plant but from the starch of its pineapple-like root bulb[i]. The root is comprised mainly of starch, similar to corn, and a complex carbohydrate called inulin, which is made up of fructose molecules.

The process by which agave starch and inulin are converted into "nectar" is VERY similar to the process by which cornstarch is converted into HFCS1.

The agave starch is converted into fructose-rich syrup using genetically modified enzymes and a chemically intensive process involving caustic acids, clarifiers, and filtration chemicals[ii]. Here is a partial list of the chemicals involved:

  • Activated charcoal

  • Cationic and ionic resins

  • Sulfuric and/or hydrofluoric acid

  • Dicalite

  • Clarimex

  • Inulin enzymes

  • Fructozyme

How natural does this sound?

The result is highly refined fructose syrup, along with some remaining inulin.

Agave syrup comes in two colors: clear or light, and amber. What's the difference?

Due to poor quality control in Mexican processing plants, some of the syrup gets burnt. Hence, the darker amber color. Of course, this poor quality control is marketed as an "artisan" variation, like amber beer, when in fact it contains higher levels of toxic impurities that arise from the sugar-heating process.

Impurities aside, agave "nectar" is neither safe nor natural with laboratory-generated fructose levels of more than 80 percent!

Is There Really a "Safe" Organic Agave?

Part of the problem leading to the confusion is that there are some natural food companies that are indeed committed to excellence and in providing the best product possible. But let me assure you that in the agave industry, this is the minority of companies.

Nevertheless, these ethical companies seek to provide an outstanding product. There are a few companies who commit to and actually achieve these criteria and actually:

  • Work with the indigenous people,

  • Use organic agave as the raw material, free of pesticides

  • Process it at low temperatures to preserve all the natural enzymes

  • Produce a final agave product that is closer to 70% fructose instead of over 90%

  • Fructose is bonded or conjugated to other sugars and not floating around as "free" fructose, like HFCS, which is far more damaging.

The VAST majority of companies however do not apply these principles and essentially produce a product that is, as this articles states, FAR worse than HFCS.

If you are going to use agave you will certainly want to seek out one of the companies that adhere to the principles above. However you will still need to exert caution in using it.

Just like fruit it is quantity issue. Fructose only becomes a metabolic poison when you consume it in quantities greater than 25 grams a day. If you consume one of the typical agave preparations that is one tablespoon, assuming you consume ZERO additional fructose in your diet, which is VERY unlikely since the average person consumes 70 grams per day.

Even a hundred years ago, long prior to modern day food processing, the average person consumed 15 grams a day.

Listen to YOUR Body

Many people will not be convinced by my arguments and data. They certainly can choose to do that but they are only hurting themselves. Fortunately there is a very simple way to learn if the fructose level you are consuming is safe.

When you consume fructose over 25 grams per day it will very likely increase its metabolic byproduct, uric acid, in your blood. So you can go to your physician and have a simple uric acid level done.

This is not a fasting test and is very inexpensive to do, it's typically free with many automated chemistry profiles.

If your level is above 5.0 you will want to consider reducing your fructose level until the level drops below 5.0. This will provide you with a valid, objective parameter to let you know if the information I am sharing is correct for you and your family.

Sales are Sweet for Agave Companies and Bad for You and Your Family

Growing consumer resistance to HFCS has been a hole-in-one for the agave industry. Need a healthy alternative to those evil HFS products?

Agave syrup to the rescue!

In case you doubt the influence of marketing in setting trends and consumer buying habits, look at these statistics:[iii]

  • New agave products more than tripled in number between 2003 and 2007, from 56 to 176. Agave syrup is now appearing in products such as energy bars, cereals and organic ice creams.

  • Revenues for the category "other liquid sweeteners," which includes agave, rose to more than $10.3 million in 2007, which was a 50 percent jump from 2006.

  • McCormick & Co., a major food manufacturer, placed agave syrup in its "top 10 flavors" list for 2009.

  • Two of Mexico's largest agave syrup manufacturers, Iidea and Nekutli, are sending increasingly large shipments of agave syrup to Germany, Japan and New Zealand due to growing global popularity.

Agave is also quickly crossing over from the health food market to mainstream grocery chains, restaurants and taverns, and consumers (especially vegans and raw food enthusiasts) are replacing their honey and maple syrup with bottles of agave after being duped into believing it's a more healthful alternative.

The Myth of Agave as a "Healthy" Sugar Substitute

It's important for you and your family's health to remember that agave syrup is neither healthy nor natural.

As reported by Dr. Ingrid Kohlstadt, a fellow of the American College of Nutrition and an associate faculty member at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health:

"Agave is almost all fructose, a highly processed sugar with great marketing."

Agave syrup is not low calorie -- it has about 16 calories per teaspoon, the same as sucrose (table sugar). The glycemic index is immaterial, once you understand the full extent of the risk this product poses to your health.

The consumption of high amounts of sugar is what is inflating America's waistline, as well as escalating rates of diabetes, blood pressure and heart disease.

Although overall sugar consumption is definitely something to be concerned about, even more problematic is one type of sugar that wreaks extraordinary havoc on your body: FRUCTOSE.

And if you want fructose, agave products next to pure fructose, have the highest percentage of fructose of any sweeteners on the market, over 50 percent more fructose than high fructose corn syrup.

Why You Need to Understand Why Fructose is so Important

All sugars are not created equal, in spite of what you might have been told.

Glucose is the form of energy your cells were actually designed to run on. Every cell in your body, every bacterium -- and in fact, nearly every living thing on the Earth -- uses glucose for energy.

But as a country, regular cane sugar, or sucrose (50 percent glucose and 50 percent fructose), is no longer the sugar of choice. It's now fructose.

This happened in the 1970s as a result of technology that made HFCS far less expensive to produce. Believe me, it was NOT done for its health benefits. This was purely an economic decision.

Let me clear up any confusion here, as fructose is the primary sugar in most fruits. It isn't that fructose is intrinsically evil -- it is just the MASSIVE DOSES you and your family are exposed to that makes it dangerous. Because it is so cheap and makes foods taste so much better, it is added to virtually every processed food.

There are two overall reasons fructose is so damaging:

  1. Your body metabolizes fructose in a much different way than glucose. Fructose is broken down in your liver just like alcohol and produces many of the side effects of chronic alcohol use, right down to the "beer belly"

  2. People are consuming fructose in quantities that are 400-800 percent higher than they were 100 years ago due to its pervasive presence in just about all processed foods

Fructose Turns to Fat and Makes You Fat!

Unlike fructose which is nearly exclusively broken down in your liver and is directly converted to dangerous fats. This is one of the reasons why fructose is the leading cause of obesity. However, only 20 percent of glucose is metabolized in your liver. This is related to the fact that nearly every cell in your body can directly use glucose as a fuel source, so it's normally "burned up" immediately after consumption.

It is also important to understand that the fructose in fruits and vegetables is not the same fructose molecule you'll find in synthetic high-fructose corn syrup, which is manufactured in the lab. Naturally occurring fructose comes along with fiber, enzymes, vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants, whereas fructose sweeteners have no nutritional value at all.

Additionally it is actually attached to other sugars and molecules and needs to be broken down before it is absorbed which limits the damage it causes. In HFCS it is a free fructose molecule, just as the glucose. Because these sugars are in their free forms their absorption is radically increased and you actually absorb far more of them had they been in their natural joined state which would cause a higher percentage of the fructose to pass to the intestine unabsorbed.

But the menace of fructose doesn't stop there.

  1. Fructose also elevates your uric acid levels, which is actually more dangerous than elevated cholesterol levels as it causes chronic, low-level inflammation, which increases your risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, cancer, arthritis and premature aging.

  2. Fructose also "tricks" your body into gaining weight by fooling your metabolism -- it actually severely impairs your body's normal appetite-control systems.

  3. Excessive fructose rapidly leads to weight gain and abdominal obesity ("beer belly"), decreased HDL, increased LDL, elevated triglycerides, elevated blood sugar, and high blood pressure -- i.e., classic metabolic syndrome.

  4. Fructose metabolism is very similar to alcohol metabolism, which has a multitude of toxic effects, including NAFLD (non-alcoholic fatty liver disease). Metabolically it's very similar to drinking alcohol without the buzz.

Remember to RADICALLY Reduce Your Fructose

These biological changes are not seen when humans or animals eat starch (or glucose), suggesting that fructose is a "bad carbohydrate" when consumed in excess of 25 grams per day.

However, it is important to remember that because fructose is so cheap it is added to nearly all processed foods. So even if you are seeking to eliminate it from your diet you will EASILY exceed 25 grams per day because it is "hidden" in so many foods. This is made worse by the deceptive and lax labeling laws which frequently allow gigantic loopholes for agribusiness to include it in the product and not identify it.

Making matters worse, your body easily becomes sensitized to fructose.

Fructose activates its own pathways in your body-those metabolic pathways become "upregulated." In other words, the more fructose you eat, the more effective your body is in absorbing it; and the more you absorb, the more damage you'll do.

You become "sensitized" to fructosr as time goes by, and more sensitive to its toxic effects as well.

Let me be clear that it isn't fructose that is the problem -- but excessive fructose. And especially the concentrated amounts of fructose that your body was NEVER designed to process, such as what's in HFCS and agave syrup.

Agave nectar is EVEN WORSE than HFCS because it's even higher in fructose than HFCS (80 percent and higher), making it an even worse metabolic menace.

Other Reasons You Should Steer Clear of Agave

  1. Poor Quality Control. There are very few quality controls in place to monitor the production of agave syrup. Nearly all agave sold in the U.S. comes from Mexico. Industry insiders are concerned that agave producers are using lesser, even toxic, agave plants due to a shortage of blue agave.

  2. Pesticides. There are also concerns that some distributors are cutting agave syrup with corn syrup -- how often and to what extent is anyone's guess. In addition, the FDA has refused shipments of agave syrup due to excessive pesticide residues.

  3. Saponins. Agave is known to contain large amounts of saponins. Saponins are toxic steroid derivatives, capable of disrupting red blood cells and producing diarrhea and vomiting. There is also a possible link between saponins and miscarriage by stimulating blood flow to the uterus, so if you're pregnant, you should definitely avoid agave products.

  4. Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF). Some agave syrups contain a contaminant called hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF, also called 5-hydroxymethyl furfural), an organic heat-formed compound that arises in the processing of fructose -- in both agave syrup and HFCS. HMF has potential toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic effects[iv]. HMF is EXTREMELY toxic to honey bees, which is a problem since commercial beekeepers feed HFCS to the bees to stimulate honey production when field-gathered nectar sources are scarce[v].

  5. Nutrient Void. Agave syrup is not a whole food -- it is fractionated and processed, devoid of the nutrients contained in the original, whole plant.

  6. Enzymes. Agave syrup is not a live food. The natural enzymes are removed to prevent agave syrup from fermenting and turning into tequila in your food pantry or cabinet.

  7. Addictiveness. Agave is, for all intents and purposes, highly concentrated sugar. Sugar and sweeteners wreak havoc on your health and are highly addictive.

What are Acceptable Alternatives to Agave?

If you are craving something sweet, your best bet is to reach for an apple or a pear. And if you give yourself a sugar holiday for even a couple of weeks, you will be amazed at how much those cravings will decrease. But be sure and count the grams of fructose and keep your total fructose from fruit below 15 grams per day as you are sure to consume plenty of "hidden" fructose in the other foods you will be eating.

You can use the table below to help you count your fructose grams.

Fruit Serving Size Grams of Fructose
Limes 1 medium 0
Lemons 1 medium 0.6
Cranberries 1 cup 0.7
Passion fruit 1 medium 0.9
Prune 1 medium 1.2
Apricot 1 medium 1.3
Guava 2 medium 2.2
Date (Deglet Noor style) 1 medium 2.6
Cantaloupe 1/8 of med. melon 2.8
Raspberries 1 cup 3.0
Clementine 1 medium 3.4
Kiwifruit 1 medium 3.4
Blackberries 1 cup 3.5
Star fruit 1 medium 3.6
Cherries, sweet 10 3.8
Strawberries 1 cup 3.8
Cherries, sour 1 cup 4.0
Pineapple 1 slice
(3.5" x .75")
4.0
Grapefruit, pink or red 1/2 medium 4.3
Fruit Serving Size Grams of Fructose
Boysenberries 1 cup 4.6
Tangerine/mandarin orange 1 medium 4.8
Nectarine 1 medium 5.4
Peach 1 medium 5.9
Orange (navel) 1 medium 6.1
Papaya 1/2 medium 6.3
Honeydew 1/8 of med. melon 6.7
Banana 1 medium 7.1
Blueberries 1 cup 7.4
Date (Medjool) 1 medium 7.7
Apple (composite) 1 medium 9.5
Persimmon 1 medium 10.6
Watermelon 1/16 med. melon 11.3
Pear 1 medium 11.8
Raisins 1/4 cup 12.3
Grapes, seedless (green or red) 1 cup 12.4
Mango 1/2 medium 16.2
Apricots, dried 1 cup 16.4
Figs, dried 1 cup 23.0

If you feel you must have a sweetener, here are a few guidelines to follow:

  • Avoid ALL artificial sweeteners.
  • Avoid agave like the plague.
  • Limit sugar of all types as much as possible. You can buy pure glucose (dextrose) as a sweetener for about $1 per pound, which has none of the adverse effects of fructose if used moderately. It is only 70 percent as sweet as sucrose, so you'll end up using a bit more of it for the same amount of sweetness, making it slightly more expensive than sucrose -- but still well worth it for your health.
  • Use raw, organic honey in moderation or avoid it completely as it is 70 percent fructose which is higher than HFCS. However the fructose is not in its free from so that moderates the damage. But each teaspoon of honey has nearly four grams of fructose so you will want to carefully add the total grams of fructose (including fruits) and keep them under 15 grams per day.
  • Use regular stevia in moderation, but avoid stevia-based sweeteners like Truvia and PureVia because they have undergone more processing.
  • Lo Han is another excellent natural herbal sweetener.
  • Exercise can be a very powerful tool to help control fructose in a number of ways. If you are going to consume fructose it is BEST to do so immediately before, during or after INTENSE exercise as your body will tend to use it directly as fuel and not convert it to fat Additionally exercise will increase your insulin receptor sensitivity and help modulate the negative effects of fructose. Lastly exercise will also help to blunt your appetite and control your sweet tooth.

If you have insulin issues, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, or if you're overweight, I suggest you avoid all sweeteners, including stevia, since any sweetener can decrease your insulin sensitivity.






Related Articles:

  Agave: A Triumph of Marketing over Truth

  This Common Food Ingredient Is As Addictive as Cocaine?

  This Common Food Ingredient Can Really Mess Up Your Metabolism

 Comments (205)
drinking fountain, water fountain

As the U.S. taste for bottled water grows, environmentalists have been trying to sell people on tap water.

Bottled water is a drain on the environment -- the U.S. public goes through about 50 billion water bottles a year, and most of those plastic containers are not recycled.

But switching to tap water could be a bad idea in some schools where the risk of lead contamination from old pipes -- known to affect physical and mental development -- is high, particularly in large urban areas such as Chicago, Los Angeles, and Washington, D.C.

A nationwide investigation showed that the drinking water in schools in 27 states is contaminated with lead and other toxic substances from lead-soldered pipes installed before 1985.

In 2007, Baltimore City public schools switched their entire system to bottled water after a study of 84 randomly selected water fountains found 10 with lead levels high than the EPA's cutoff of 20 parts per billion.

The school district decided it would be cheaper to provide bottled water than testing and remediation efforts.

Sources:

Dr. Mercola's Comments:

Kids need access to healthy beverages when they're at school, and the best choice -- far better than soda, sports drinks and even fruit juice -- is water. But the water must be pure in order for it to be healthy.

Unfortunately, the tap water that comes out of the drinking fountains at many U.S. schools is not safe. The problem is two-fold:

  • Older schools may contain lead-soldered pipes that allow the metal to flake into water supplies or result in lead-contaminated water, especially when the water sits over weekends and holidays.
  • Schools that get their water from public supplies do not have to test for toxins, which means they may contain harmful levels of contaminants and no one would know.

Water from Schools in All 50 States May be Unsafe

Last year the Associated Press analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency on school drinking water and what they found was unsettling, to say the least.

Thousands of schools in the United States -- in rural areas and big cities, in both public and private schools -- had drinking water contaminated with lead, pesticides and other toxins. In all, about 100 school districts and 2,250 schools had water that violated federal water safety standards, including one out of five schools with well water.

Among the most pervasive contaminants detected were coliform bacteria, lead, copper, arsenic and nitrates.

Contaminated drinking water is a reality for many communities across the United States, but the risks become even more apparent when you're dealing with water being supplied to children from a location that is supposed to be safe and protected: their school.

Environmental toxins, including those in drinking water, pose an extra risk to kids, as well. Children not only drink more water for their size than adults do, but they're also more vulnerable to damage from the toxins contained therein.

Serious Health Risks to Children Who Drink Contaminated Water

Chronic high levels of lead is associated with decreased intelligence and neurological impairment in children -- including the potential of permanent brain damage if they're exposed to high levels at an early age.

Making the possibility of lead poisoning even worse are the studies showing that fluoridated water supplies (which include most public supplies in the U.S.) can increase children's absorption of lead, and, when lead is introduced into your body in sufficient quantities, it displaces zinc, which also disrupts brain cell growth.

Arsenic, another common contaminant in school drinking water, has been linked to an increased risk of cancer of your bladder, lungs, liver and other organs. Arsenic can also damage chromosomes, which house the genetic material inside the cells of your body, and lead to reduced intelligence in children.

It's believed the side effects from arsenic exposure in drinking water typically take years to develop. Much of it depends on the concentration of arsenic to which you or your children are exposed. Most arsenic leaves your body within three days of exposure, but the arsenic that remains is stored in your brain, bones and tissue and continues to do serious damage.

Further, pesticides, which are also showing up in school water supplies, are especially dangerous to children because they are still developing, and may not be able to fully remove pesticides from their body.

Researchers are increasingly pointing to pesticide and herbicide contamination as one cause for the many reported cases of autism, as well as attention deficit disorder (ADD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Additionally, other researchers are finding links between pesticide exposure and decreased cognitive abilities, and aggression in children.

Your nervous system, your immune system, and your endocrine (hormone) system are all closely related and in constant communication with each other, so when any one of the three systems is damaged or degraded, the other two may be adversely affected as well.

Pesticides and herbicides can adversely affect your child's thyroid hormones, too. This is important, as irritability and aggressive behavior are linked to your thyroid hormone levels. Furthermore, some studies have shown that attention deficit and/or hyperactivity disorders in children are linked to changes in their levels of thyroid hormone.

While some of the damage of these toxins may be apparent immediately, other harm may not appear until years later.

Is Bottled Water the Right Solution?

Acknowledging the problems with water safety, some school districts are turning to bottled water as a solution. In Baltimore City public schools, for instance, National Geographic reported that they made the switch after detected 10 drinking fountains with lead levels higher than the EPA's safe limit. They decided it would be cheaper to provide kids with bottled water than to go through testing and remediation at their schools.

But while bottled water may give kids a quick alternative to drinking fountains, it is a shortsighted solution. First, bottled water is a disaster for the environment. National Geographic cited one statistic that the U.S. public goes through 50 billion water bottles every year . and most of those are never recycled!

Plus, bottled water is of questionable purity as well. In fact, about 40 percent of bottled water IS regular tap water, which may or may not have received any additional treatment. So it's arguable whether it's really safer for kids.

Plus, when you take into account the health hazards imparted by the chemicals leaching out of the plastic bottle itself, then bottled water really doesn't make sense, no matter whether your child drinks it at school or at home.

A Safe Option for Kids

I recommend teaching your child to avoid the drinking fountain at school, as there's no telling what types of contaminants could be in the water. As an aside, school drinking fountains are also veritable Petri dishes, and studies have found they may contain anywhere from 62,000 to 2.7 million bacteria per square inch of the spigot.

So if you tell your child not to use the drinking fountain, where should their water come from?

The best alternative to having pure water that is also safe for the environment is to use a high-quality filter for your home.

Many schools now allow children to bring a water bottle to school with them, so I recommend sending your child to school with a day's supply of this filtered water from your home -- in a safe, chemical-free bottle -- so he or she has plenty of pure water to sip on throughout the day.



Related Articles:

  Beware of Lead in Your Tap Water

  Is Bottled Water Really Pure?

  Why are Millions in the US Drinking Filthy Water - Even in Upscale Suburbs?

 Comments (1)

drinking fountain, water fountain

As the U.S. taste for bottled water grows, environmentalists have been trying to sell people on tap water.

Bottled water is a drain on the environment -- the U.S. public goes through about 50 billion water bottles a year, and most of those plastic containers are not recycled.

But switching to tap water could be a bad idea in some schools where the risk of lead contamination from old pipes -- known to affect physical and mental development -- is high, particularly in large urban areas such as Chicago, Los Angeles, and Washington, D.C.

A nationwide investigation showed that the drinking water in schools in 27 states is contaminated with lead and other toxic substances from lead-soldered pipes installed before 1985.

In 2007, Baltimore City public schools switched their entire system to bottled water after a study of 84 randomly selected water fountains found 10 with lead levels high than the EPA's cutoff of 20 parts per billion.

The school district decided it would be cheaper to provide bottled water than testing and remediation efforts.

Sources:

Dr. Mercola's Comments:

Kids need access to healthy beverages when they're at school, and the best choice -- far better than soda, sports drinks and even fruit juice -- is water. But the water must be pure in order for it to be healthy.

Unfortunately, the tap water that comes out of the drinking fountains at many U.S. schools is not safe. The problem is two-fold:

  • Older schools may contain lead-soldered pipes that allow the metal to flake into water supplies or result in lead-contaminated water, especially when the water sits over weekends and holidays.
  • Schools that get their water from public supplies do not have to test for toxins, which means they may contain harmful levels of contaminants and no one would know.

Water from Schools in All 50 States May be Unsafe

Last year the Associated Press analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency on school drinking water and what they found was unsettling, to say the least.

Thousands of schools in the United States -- in rural areas and big cities, in both public and private schools -- had drinking water contaminated with lead, pesticides and other toxins. In all, about 100 school districts and 2,250 schools had water that violated federal water safety standards, including one out of five schools with well water.

Among the most pervasive contaminants detected were coliform bacteria, lead, copper, arsenic and nitrates.

Contaminated drinking water is a reality for many communities across the United States, but the risks become even more apparent when you're dealing with water being supplied to children from a location that is supposed to be safe and protected: their school.

Environmental toxins, including those in drinking water, pose an extra risk to kids, as well. Children not only drink more water for their size than adults do, but they're also more vulnerable to damage from the toxins contained therein.

Serious Health Risks to Children Who Drink Contaminated Water

Chronic high levels of lead is associated with decreased intelligence and neurological impairment in children -- including the potential of permanent brain damage if they're exposed to high levels at an early age.

Making the possibility of lead poisoning even worse are the studies showing that fluoridated water supplies (which include most public supplies in the U.S.) can increase children's absorption of lead, and, when lead is introduced into your body in sufficient quantities, it displaces zinc, which also disrupts brain cell growth.

Arsenic, another common contaminant in school drinking water, has been linked to an increased risk of cancer of your bladder, lungs, liver and other organs. Arsenic can also damage chromosomes, which house the genetic material inside the cells of your body, and lead to reduced intelligence in children.

It's believed the side effects from arsenic exposure in drinking water typically take years to develop. Much of it depends on the concentration of arsenic to which you or your children are exposed. Most arsenic leaves your body within three days of exposure, but the arsenic that remains is stored in your brain, bones and tissue and continues to do serious damage.

Further, pesticides, which are also showing up in school water supplies, are especially dangerous to children because they are still developing, and may not be able to fully remove pesticides from their body.

Researchers are increasingly pointing to pesticide and herbicide contamination as one cause for the many reported cases of autism, as well as attention deficit disorder (ADD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Additionally, other researchers are finding links between pesticide exposure and decreased cognitive abilities, and aggression in children.

Your nervous system, your immune system, and your endocrine (hormone) system are all closely related and in constant communication with each other, so when any one of the three systems is damaged or degraded, the other two may be adversely affected as well.

Pesticides and herbicides can adversely affect your child's thyroid hormones, too. This is important, as irritability and aggressive behavior are linked to your thyroid hormone levels. Furthermore, some studies have shown that attention deficit and/or hyperactivity disorders in children are linked to changes in their levels of thyroid hormone.

While some of the damage of these toxins may be apparent immediately, other harm may not appear until years later.

Is Bottled Water the Right Solution?

Acknowledging the problems with water safety, some school districts are turning to bottled water as a solution. In Baltimore City public schools, for instance, National Geographic reported that they made the switch after detected 10 drinking fountains with lead levels higher than the EPA's safe limit. They decided it would be cheaper to provide kids with bottled water than to go through testing and remediation at their schools.

But while bottled water may give kids a quick alternative to drinking fountains, it is a shortsighted solution. First, bottled water is a disaster for the environment. National Geographic cited one statistic that the U.S. public goes through 50 billion water bottles every year . and most of those are never recycled!

Plus, bottled water is of questionable purity as well. In fact, about 40 percent of bottled water IS regular tap water, which may or may not have received any additional treatment. So it's arguable whether it's really safer for kids.

Plus, when you take into account the health hazards imparted by the chemicals leaching out of the plastic bottle itself, then bottled water really doesn't make sense, no matter whether your child drinks it at school or at home.

A Safe Option for Kids

I recommend teaching your child to avoid the drinking fountain at school, as there's no telling what types of contaminants could be in the water. As an aside, school drinking fountains are also veritable Petri dishes, and studies have found they may contain anywhere from 62,000 to 2.7 million bacteria per square inch of the spigot.

So if you tell your child not to use the drinking fountain, where should their water come from?

The best alternative to having pure water that is also safe for the environment is to use a high-quality filter for your home.

Many schools now allow children to bring a water bottle to school with them, so I recommend sending your child to school with a day's supply of this filtered water from your home -- in a safe, chemical-free bottle -- so he or she has plenty of pure water to sip on throughout the day.



Related Articles:

  Beware of Lead in Your Tap Water

  Is Bottled Water Really Pure?

  Why are Millions in the US Drinking Filthy Water - Even in Upscale Suburbs?

 Comments (29)

vaccines

A study conducted at the University of Michigan shows that, although parents overwhelmingly share the belief that vaccines are a good way to protect their children from disease, these same parents express concerns regarding potential adverse effects of vaccines.

They especially seem to question the safety of new vaccines.

The study is based on a survey of more than 1,500 parents that was conducted last year. About 12 percent of parents said they had refused to allow their children to receive a vaccine that a doctor recommended.

Those parents tended to shy away from four vaccines:

  • Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, because of concerns about side effects
  • Vaccine for meningococcal diseases, because of the risk of Guillain-Barr
    vaccines

    A study conducted at the University of Michigan shows that, although parents overwhelmingly share the belief that vaccines are a good way to protect their children from disease, these same parents express concerns regarding potential adverse effects of vaccines.

    They especially seem to question the safety of new vaccines.

    The study is based on a survey of more than 1,500 parents that was conducted last year. About 12 percent of parents said they had refused to allow their children to receive a vaccine that a doctor recommended.

    Those parents tended to shy away from four vaccines:

    • Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, because of concerns about side effects
    • Vaccine for meningococcal diseases, because of the risk of Guillain-Barr

      ← Previous PageNext Page →